This article originally provided by
The
Charleston Gazette
June 20, 2008
Special session Revisit election law
Gov. Joe Manchin should include another look at the state's campaign finance
law on his agenda for an upcoming special session of the Legislature.
Manchin is expected to call a one-day session to deal with teacher retirement
issues. But another topic just as urgent is a flawed state law that was
partially struck down by U.S. District Judge David Faber.
In 2005, the Legislature tried to prevent anonymous special-issue groups from
running election-related campaigns without saying who they are and who provides
their money. The Legislature enacted the law change because Massey Energy's
chief funded a nonprofit group called And for the Sake of the Kids to unseat
Supreme Court Justice Warren McGraw. The new statute required financial
disclosure by groups that run campaign or advocacy ads costing $5,000 or more
just prior to elections, when the ads apply to clearly identifiable candidates
for statewide office. The change enjoyed broad, bipartisan support.
In response, the Center for Individual Freedom Inc., a 10-year-old
Virginia-based group, sued, saying the law inhibited free speech. Judge Faber
agreed in part, saying the state law was too vague.
House Judiciary Chairman Carrie Webster, D-Kanawha, says the law can be fixed.
She and other legislators have been working on an improved version that could be
ready in time for a one-day legislative session.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Jeff Kessler recently told Statehouse reporter Phil
Kabler: "I have all faith in the electorate of West Virginia to make the proper
decisions, if they have all the facts."
Well said. That is exactly what campaign disclosure laws are designed to do -
ensure that voters know who is paying for what messages intended to influence
elections. Who is spending and how much they spend also helps voters to weigh
what they are being told and to make smart decisions.
Lawmakers can certainly craft a better bill that gives voters as much
information as possible without violating the sacred principle of free speech.
This month may be the last chance to repair this law before the 2008 general
election.
We applaud the governor for keeping expensive special sessions short and few.
This issue is important enough to deserve a spot on the most limited agenda.
Legislators have been working hard to repair the flawed law. They should have a
chance to make this right for the electorate. |